ScientificJournals.com  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LCA

Letters to the Editor

 
On the Meaning of Fuzzy Approach and Normalisation in Life Cycle Impact Assessment (see this issue, Güereca et al., 488-496) – 12 lca (7) 2007
Land Use in LCA - We seldom think of what we have, but always think of what we miss – 12 lca (2) 2007
The Impact of Mineral Resource Depletion - In response to Steen BA (2006): Abiotic Resource Depletion: Different perceptions of the problem with mineral deposits. Int J LCA 11 (Special Issue 1) 49-54 – 11 lca (5) 2006
How to approach land use in LCIA or, how to avoid the Cinderella effect? – 11 lca (4) 2006
Response to ´Comments on Workshop Report on the Economic and Environmental Impacts of Biobased Production´ [Int J LCA 10 (3) 226-227 (2005)]. Int J LCA 10 (4) 233-234 – 11 lca (3) 2006
Scoping Must be Done in Accordance with the Goal Definition, also in Social LCA – 11 lca (2) 2006
ISO 14044 also Applies to Social LCA – 10 lca (6) 2005
The Resource Debate Needs to Continue [Stewart M, Weidema B (2005): A Consistent Framework for Assessing the Impacts from Resource Use. Int J LCA 10 (4) 240−247] – 10 lca (5) 2005
Comment on ´The Critical Review Process According to ISO 14040-43: An Analysis of the Standards and Experiences Gained in their Application´ by Walter Klöpffer, Int J LCA 10 (2) 98-102 (2005) – 10 lca (4) 2005
Comments on Workshop Report on the Economic and Environmental Impacts of Biobased Production by Amy E. Landis and Thomas L. Theis [Int J LCA 10 (3) 226-227 (2005)] – 10 lca (4) 2005
The ecoinvent Database [Int J LCA 10 (1) 1–94 (2005)] – 10 lca (2) 2005
The Ecology of Scale: Assessment of Regional Turnover and Comparison with Global Food´ by Elmar Schlich and Ulla Fleissner (3 pp) – 10 lca (3) 2005
Assessment of Toxicological Risks due to Hazardous Substances: Scoring of Risk Phrases – 8 lca (1) 2003
How or to Whom Do We Communicate LCA Results? Comments to the Editorial in Int. J. LCA 5 (3) 125 (2000) – 5 lca (4) 2000
Economic Allocation and Value-Corrected Substitution, Comments and Reply – 5 lca (4) 2000
LCA from a Sustainability Perspective - Comments and Reply – 5 lca (4) 2000
How or to Whom Do We Communicate LCA Results? Comments to the Editorial in Int. J. LCA 5 (3) 125 (2000) – 5 lca (4) 2000
ISO 14042 Restricts Use and Development of Impact Assessment – 3 lca (4) 1998
Data Quality of Life Cycle Inventory Data - Rules of Thumb – 3 lca (2) 1998
Towards Region-Specific, European Fate Factors for Airborne Nitrogen Compounds Causing Aquatic Eutrophication * – 5 lca (2) 2000
Long-Term Emissions from Landfills Should Not be Disregarded – 4 lca (3) 1999
Comment: Uncertainty in LCIA of Toxic Releases – 4 lca (2) 1999
Reply: Uncertainty in LCIA of Toxic Releases – 4 lca (2) 1999
In Reply to Hertwich & Pease, Int. J. LCA 3 (4) 180 - 181, – 4 lca (2) 1999
 
 Comment and Reply 
Marginal Production Technologies for Life Cycle Inventories by Weidema, B.P.; Frees, N.; Nielsen, A.-M. – 4 lca (6) 1999
Marginal Production Technologies for Life Cycle Inventories by Weidema, B.P.; Frees, N.; Nielsen, A.-M. – 4 lca (6) 1999
Reply: The Structure of Impact Assessment – 4 lca (1) 1999
Comment: The Structure of Impact Assessment: Mutually Independent Dimensions as a Function of Modifiers – 4 lca (1) 1999
 
 Response to Helias Udo de Haes 
Key Elements in a Framework for Land Use Impact Assessment in LCA – 12 lca (1) 2007
Development: Enterprise Technologies