ScientificJournals.com  

LCA

LCA Methodology



Valuation Methods Within LCA – Where are the Values?
Göran Finnveden
Corresponding author:: Göran Finnveden, IVL (Swedish Environmental Research Institute), PO Box 21060, S-100 31 Stockholm, Sweden and Department of Chemical Engineering, Applied Electrochemistry, Royal Institute of Technology, S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract Request for single articles





It is generally recognised that the valuation in LCA requires political, ideological and/or ethical values (hence the term). These values, however, are seldom discussed, and this paper may be seen as an early attempt. One result is that not only the valuation weighting factors, but also the choice of valuation methodology and the choice of using a valuation weighting method at all, are influenced by fundamental ethical and ideological valuations. Since there is no societal consensus on these fundamental values, and never will be one in an open democratic society, there is no reason to expect consensus either on valuation weighting factors, or on the valuation method or even on the choice of using a valuation weighting method at all. Another result of the discussion on values is that the ethical and ideological valuations are often made implicitly in the choice of method, data, etc., thus making it difficult to discuss the values and the implications of different standpoints. Although this paper focus on the valuation methods within LCA, it is expected that much of the discussion and the conclusions are of relevance for other environmental management tools, e.g. Environmental Impact Assessment.

2 LCA (3) 163-169 (1997)

Development: Enterprise Technologies