 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entries for Prof. Dr. Helias Udo de Haes
|
| Academic degree: | Prof. Dr. |  | | Last name: | Udo de Haes | | First name: | Helias | | Responsible for: | | | Organization/Institute: | Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML) | | Department: | Leiden University | | Position: | | | Street, Number, POB: | Einsteinweg 2 | | Postal code, City: | NL-2300 RA Leiden | | State: | | | Country: | The Netherlands | | Phone: | | | Fax: | | | E-mail address: | udodehaes@cml.leidenuniv.nl | | Url: | | | Curriculum vitae: | Prof. Helias A. Udo de Haes graduated in 1968 in biology at Leiden University. He performed his PhD research in the Max Planck Institut fuer Verhaltensphysiologie, in Seewiesen, Germany.
After some years at the Technical University in Delft he joined the new department on Environmental Biology at Leiden University.
In 1978 he founded CML as an interfacultary institute at the same university, of which institute he is still the scientific director.
Since the beginning of the eighties, research regarding the development of tools for environmental systems analysis came on the agenda of the institute, in particular Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Substance Flow Analysis (SFA).
Personally he is very active in the field of LCA, mainly at an international level. He is chairman of the LCA Steering Committee of SETAC-Europe, and also of the working group on Life Cycle Impact Assessment of this organisation.
Furthermore, he contributes since about 1995 to the standardisation of LCA under ISO and is designated scientific director of the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative for identifying best available practice in Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Management. | | Areas of interest: | | life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) | | ecolabelling | | |
| | Articles: | 13 LCA (3) 177 (2008), Happy Birthday
13 LCA (2) 89-95 (2008), Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Products (with Comments by Helias A. Udo De Haes, p. 95) (7 pp)
11 LCA (4) 219-221 (2006), How to approach land use in LCIA or, how to avoid the Cinderella effect?
11 LCA (1) 75-76 (2006), Key Observations Arising from Papers on Sustainable Production, Use and Recycling of Natural Resources
11 LCA (1) 55-59 (2006), Potentials and Limitations of Life Cycle Assessment in Setting Ecolabelling Criteria: A Case Study of Thai Shrimp Aquaculture Product (5 pp)
11 LCA (1) 2 (2006), Sustainable Management of Natural Resources in an Life-cycle Perspective (Issue Editor: Helias A. Udo de Haes)
9 LCA (6) 394-404 (2004), The LCIA Midpoint-Damage Framework of the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative (11 pp)
8 LCA (5) 307-309 (2003), Commentary: The UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative - A Personal View of the Results after One Year
2 LCA_Village (03) 1-8 (2002), Areas of Protection, Third Draft, February 2001 (Helias A. Udo de Haes)
2 LCA_Village (03) 1-5 (2002), Areas of Protection, Second Draft, December 22, 2000 (Helias A. Udo de Haes, Erwin Lindeijer)
2 LCA_Village (03) 1-5 (2002), Areas of Protection, Draft Chapter, February 2, 2001 (Helias A. Udo de Haes, Erwin Lindeijer)
2 LCA_Village (03) 1-8 (2002), Areas of Protection, Final Draft Chapter, February 23, 2001 (Helias A. Udo de Haes, Erwin Lindeijer)
2 LCA_Village (03) 1-2 (2002), Areas of Protection, First Draft, November 21, 2000 (Helias A. Udo de Haes, Erwin Lindeijer)
2 LCA_Village (03) 1-2 (2002), Debate: Best Available Practice Regarding Impact Categories and Category Indicators in LCIA - Reply by Helias Udo de Haes, September 1999: Man-made Environment and Generic Application Dependency
2 LCA_Village (03) 1-8 (2002), Part 2, Background Document for the 2nd WG on LCIA of SETAC-Europe (WIA-2, February 1999) - Best Available Practice Regarding Impact Categories and Category Indicators in Life Cycle Impact Assessment
03 LCA_Village (2) 1-9 (2002), Part 1, Background Document for the 2nd WG on LCIA of SETAC-Europe (WIA-2, February 1999) - Best Available Practice Regarding Impact Categories and Category Indicators in Life Cycle Impact Assessment
5 LCA (6) 327-334 (2000), Component Manufacturing Analysis
4 LCA (2) 66-74 (1999), Best Available Practice Regarding Impact Categories and Category Indicators in Life Cycle Impact Assessment
4 LCA (3) 167-174 (1999), Best Available Practice Regarding Impact Categories and Category Indicators in Life Cycle Impact Assessment
4 LCA (2) 65 (1999), In Reply to Hertwich & Pease, Int. J. LCA 3 (4) 180 - 181,
4 LCA (5) 299-306 (1999), Life Cycle Impact Assessment Sophistication
1 LCA (3) 168-170 (1996), Environmental Certification
7 LCA (4) 252 (2002), Annual Report 2001 - The Year 2001 in Retrospect
2 LCA (1) 33-38 (1997), The Agro-Production Chain
5 LCA (6) 319-326 (2000), Life Cycle Impact Assessment Workshop Summary
6 ESPR (1) 49-58 (1999), Using SFA Indicators to Support Environmental Policy
LCA – Online First, Background, Aims and Scope
6 LCA (6) 325-333 (2001), Life Cycle Management: UNEP-Workshop
4 LCA (2) 75-80 (1999), How Does ISO/DIS 14042 on Life Cycle Impact Assessment Accommodate Current Best Available Practice?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
